Some sections also includes ‘other signals on our radar.’ Write back and let us know if you’d like to see more detail on any of those.

In Force is a weekly intelligence brief for P&C Insurance executives, delivering high-impact developments shaping the P&C space: what happened, why it matters, and what to do about it. It is designed for carrier and insurtech strategy, product management, marketing, sales, broker/agent relations, and innovation teams. Each issue distills complex shifts into decision-grade insight.

In Force is weekly, other Paid subscriber benefits include monthly deep-dives, quarterly trackers, and Premier Plan subscribers have Analyst Access.

Multiple major P&C carriers reported Q4 and full-year 2025 results during the week of February 3–5, 2026, underscoring exceptionally strong underwriting and earnings across the sector, consistent with a late-cycle profitability peak.

Chubb CEO Evan Greenberg cautioned on the earnings call that while results are strong, homeowners loss costs are rising 7.5–8%, warning that politicizing insurance affordability risks creating an availability problem. Allstate CEO Tom Wilson emphasized that the company proactively reduced premiums for 7.8 million auto and homeowners customers, framing the move as returning value to policyholders amid improved profitability. Everest stood apart from peers with a deliberate contraction of its Insurance segment, driven by targeted reductions in U.S. casualty lines, reflecting continued pressure in casualty underwriting despite favorable broader industry conditions.

The earnings wave confirms that 2025 was a generational year for P&C profitability and that these results are now drawing public and regulatory attention. Greenberg’s unprompted comments about affordability and excess profit laws signal that the industry is bracing for political scrutiny. Allstate’s decision to highlight $1.5 billion in voluntary premium reductions is a preemptive narrative move. For market researchers and strategists, the divergence between Everest shrinking its casualty book and Chubb and Allstate expanding provides a real-time case study in how different carriers are reading the casualty environment.

During the first week of February 2026, three major loss estimators released early insured-loss figures for January’s Winter Storm Fern (Jan 23–27), which affected more than half of U.S. states and about 200 million people, with freeze identified as the primary driver of losses.

If current estimates hold, Fern would rank as the third-costliest U.S. winter storm on record, behind Winter Storm Uri (2021, ~ $18B) and Winter Storm Elliott (2022, ~ $8B) in insured losses (as referenced in coverage). Sources also indicate Texas and Tennessee were among the most heavily impacted states, with disproportionate losses in southern/southeastern regions because building stock there is generally not constructed to withstand prolonged subfreezing temperatures and associated snow/freezing rain.

The critical detail is that this event will be retained entirely by primary insurers. With post-2023 reinsurance attachment points remaining elevated, Fitch's assessment that Fern falls below most reinsurance triggers means the $4–7 billion in losses flows directly to carriers' retained books. This reinforces the structural shift since 2023: primary insurers bear a larger share of secondary peril losses, and reinsurers have shown no appetite to step back down. For carriers with geographic concentrations in the affected states, particularly Texas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Kentucky, the impact on Q1 2026 earnings could be material, even if capital positions remain sound.

Also during Chubb’s Q4 2025 earnings call, CEO Evan Greenberg was asked about Chubb’s exposure to the accelerating data-center construction and operations cycle. Greenberg said Chubb is “all over it,” describing the firm’s capabilities as “extremely broad” on a global basis. He explained that Chubb provides end-to-end coverage for data-center developers and operators, writing primary property and builders’ risk, performing engineering for underwriting, and covering a wide range of exposures including marine, surety, general liability, and professional liability. “We have a large capacity, and others take shares behind us, generally. We are one of the few that writes insurance around the broad variety of exposures globally that those who are constructing data centers confront,” he said.

In the context of the discussion, coverage noted that global digital-infrastructure investment could approach $3 trillion over the next five years, with thousands of data centers potentially built worldwide, underscoring the scale of the opportunity. Greenberg cautioned, however, that the build-out faces material headwinds: the affordability and availability of power to run data centers, growing pushback on siting, labor availability for construction, and supply-chain and cost pressures. While acknowledging the volume of announced projects, he warned against excessive optimism, saying there is “a lot announced” but investors and insurers should be careful “not to be overly breathless about this.”

Data center insurance is emerging as one of the most significant organic growth opportunities in commercial lines. Chubb's explicit claim to lead carrier status, writing primary, providing engineering, and covering the full exposure stack, is a competitive positioning statement directed at brokers who structure these large, complex placements. For mid market carriers and specialty MGAs, Chubb's scale advantage is a barrier to entry on mega projects, but niche opportunities exist in smaller builds, specific geographies, or modular and edge computing facilities. Greenberg's caution on headwinds is notable: if energy constraints slow the buildout, the premium opportunity may be more drawn out than current projections suggest.

The Marsh Global Insurance Market Index (published February 3) provided the most granular read on the continued deterioration of the U.S. commercial casualty market. U.S. casualty rates rose 9% in Q4 2025 (up from 8% in Q3), workers’ compensation increased 12%, and the U.S. umbrella/excess liability market saw risk-adjusted rate increases of 19% (up from 16% in Q3). Marsh noted that some insurers are now offering a maximum of $10 million per risk in excess liability, citing adverse developments in the U.S. litigation environment. Workers’ compensation insurers also pointed to rising reserves and medical costs as sources of future rate pressure.

The week also brought Everest Group’s Q4 2025 results (February 4), which illustrated the strategic consequences of these conditions. Everest’s Insurance segment posted a Q4 combined ratio of 117.0% and a full-year combined ratio of 114.6%, with Q4 gross written premiums down 20.1% on a comparable basis. Management attributed the decline to “deliberate underwriting actions” and “targeted reductions in certain casualty lines,” partially offset by strong double-digit growth in specialty lines, emphasizing that the pullback was strategic rather than reactive.

Cyber pricing continues to soften even as adjacent casualty lines harden, reinforcing that cyber is being underwritten as a capacity driven product rather than a litigation exposed liability class. The divergence matters because it is reshaping portfolio economics. As casualty and umbrella absorb capital and management attention, cyber is increasingly positioned as a volume stabilizer rather than a margin driver. For carriers with combined cyber and casualty portfolios, the contrast raises questions about how long cyber can remain competitively priced before capital discipline reasserts itself, particularly if loss activity or systemic events resurface.

P&C Insurance Executive Intelligence is for strategy, product, and executive leaders in carriers, reinsurers, and insurance platforms navigating commercial lines disruption.

Ping us at [email protected] if you'd like to learn more, explore Enterprise Subscriptions, or would like to partner in other ways.

The Intelligence Council is a next-gen B2B media and business intelligence platform built for people who make strategy, allocate capital, and carry operating risk.